The 4 M's

The 4 M's have become incredibly important in the world today. These M's stand for oppression, media bias, stirring up hatred and a severe curtailing on what we see, hear and read.  

Of course, they also stand for something else. Murdoch's Maniacal Media Machine.

Rupert Murdoch is undoubtedly one of the most powerful people on the face of this planet. He wields his influence globally through his media conglomerate News Corporation. There is barely anywhere in the world that you could go without seeing some form of media controlled by Murdoch.

Known throughout the world mainly for his ownership of FOX, he has amassed the type of power that an old style emperor might have. He has been at the forefront of several aggressive takeovers of smaller media outlets, and is currently involved in a battle of wits with the British Government over his proposed takeover of BSkyB.

But with such power, there should surely come some sort of responsibility for Murdoch to be a fair and just voice through his media machine. Alas, it would be easier to ask a penguin to paint my garden wall.

He has used the once noble vocation of journalism like a child uses a cheap toy. They play around with it, chew it up, spit it up and finally, when they no longer care for it, throw it away to let the dog have its way with it. Once Murdoch is taken from us , journalism will be left to fight for the scraps. His empire will crumble and fall and be divided amongst his children, friends, enemies and lovers (if anyone ever loved him.)

But before he goes he is determined to amass as much power as possible. Should he acquire BSkyB, he will essentially control the majority of the media in Britain. The BBC nad Channel 4 will be the only voices of reason left in television, with the Guardian left fighting off the hordes of Nurdoch owned papers.

It is ironic that the Murdoch University in Australia, completely unconnected to him, is known as one of the best colleges of journalism in the country. While journalism has changed as a profession, there can be no doubt that with him at the forefront, it has become lazy and sleazy.

When the time eventually comes for him to go to that Sky box in the sky, I, for one, will not be mourning him. I will be making a desperate grab to take over one of his papers like everyone else.

After all, he is the Devil.


( For legal purpose, Rupert Murdoch is not the actual Devil. Comments made here are the opinion of the author and the author alone, and in no way represent the views of blogspot.com)

 

When I was growing up, one of the first things I remember hearing on television was Bill Clinton’s now immortal statement “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”. Ever since then, I, like a lot of the western world, have developed an innate curiosity with US politics in general. And now, with the mid-term elections looming, it’s time to look forward to the rollercoaster yet again.

Mid-term elections are a curious thing for many people living in Ireland, England and most of Europe. In many countries, elections are only held if the government collapses, if there is a change of leader, deaths or retirements. The United States, however, is different.

The mid-term elections are considered extremely important in US politics. As the name suggests, they are held midway throughout the incumbent president’s term. This means that they are generally held every four years, with the most recent being in 2006.

In a mid-term election, control of both Houses of Congress is in essence up for grabs. All 435 seats in the House of Representatives all face re-election, while a third of the members in the Senate have to face the voters, regardless of whether they’ve been there for two years or twenty years. This time round, 37 Senate seats are being contested.

These elections are being held amid the recessionary gloom and doom, which many experts have predicted will mean bad things for the Democrats. Currently in control of the House of Representatives (257 seats to 178), and also the Senate (59 seats to 41), they have been campaigning furiously in order to limit the number of losses. However, many commentators are predicting that this campaigning will ultimately be futile. The common consensus in America is that the Republicans will gain seats and once again regain control of the House of Representatives. The Senate has been a lot closer to call, with no-one able to make a solid prediction as to who will be in control after the election.

This has been in part due to the emergence of the Tea Party movement. This movement was started mainly by people angry at “big government” spending. Mainly composed of Republicans dissatisfied with the way the party is being run, they have proven to be effective at garnering support away from conventional candidates. This was seen in the Delaware primary, where Christine O’Donnell, backed by the Tea Party and Sarah Palin, defeated Republican backed candidate Mike Castle.

This has been seen as a good thing for her Democrat opponent, as Tea Party supporters are seen as very right-wing, much more so than the Republican Party in general. But with the strong anti-incumbent, anti-government feeling currently sweeping across the country, this may not translate into any success whatsoever.

It will be a difficult election for Barack Obama, no matter the results. He approaches these elections in what can only be described as a terrible political state. He has been attacked on all sides because of what has been seen as his failure to control government spending and the vast number of unemployed. His approval rating has fallen to under 50% and even those who would have voted for him two years ago are turning their back on him for what they perceive as the lack of change he has brought to the country.

The healthcare reform that Obama has committed himself, and indeed his party to, has cost him much of the popularity that swept him to power a little under two years ago. He has been slammed for spending what has been described as an exorbitant amount of money at a time when there are millions of people in the United States unemployed.

With the Democrats poised to lose control of at least one House of Congress, questions will be asked whether the rest of Obama’s term will be marked by Republican blocking of any legislation. This has occurred often enough throughout history that it will be a real concern for Obama’s administration.

It will be a concern for them because despite the common consensus of the US president being the “most powerful man in the world”, it is in fact Congress who holds the power to make or break any piece of legislation. This means that had the Republicans held any sort of majority in either house when the healthcare legislation was proposed, then its defeat would have been a certainty.

President Obama still has a little over two years to ensure he makes the kind of changes he so emphatically promised on the campaign trail only two years ago. But without Congress on his side, and with the American people only a few steps away from revolting in the streets, the challenges he faces are overwhelming. It will be interesting to see whether he will be able to overcome them.

Welcome to a new era of information!

Welcome! Wilkommen! Failte Roit! Plus other language welcomes as well. I9 apologise for not knowing more, but that's not what I do.

You have decided to look at my blog. Congratulations to you! I promise you, whoever you are, and wherever you may be, that I will seek to inform you about anything political worldwide.

This is my first venture into the blogging world, so it may take me a while to come fully to grips, but once I'm in control, there will be no stopping me.

I do hope you check back for my first article. Guten Tag!